Original Shogun director slates Emmy-winning adaptation as ‘not entertaining’


Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Jerry London, who directed the 1980 NBC adaptation of Shōgunhas dismissed last year’s award-winning FX version as “not entertaining for an American audience.”

Last September, Shōgun took home 18 Emmys to shatter the record for the amount of prizes taken home for a single season of television.

It was similarly fêted at the Golden Globes, where it swept the awards for television drama.

However, one person who wasn’t impressed by the series was London, who was nominated for an Emmy and won a Directors Guild Award for his own nine-hour adaptation of James Clavell’s 1975 novel.

Speaking to The Hollywood ReporterLondon argued that the new version “is not entertaining for an American audience.”

He continued: “It’s completely different from the one I did. Mine was based on the love story of Shogun between Blackthorne and Mariko, and this new one is based on Japanese history, and it’s more about Toranaga, who was the Shogun.

Anna Sawai as Toda Mariko in a scene from the 2024 version of ‘Shogun’
Anna Sawai as Toda Mariko in a scene from the 2024 version of ‘Shogun’ (Copyright 2024, FX. All Rights Reserved.)

“It’s very technical and very difficult for an American audience to get their grips into it. I’ve talked to many people that have watched it, and they said, ‘I had to turn it off because I don’t understand it.’ So the filmmakers of the new one really didn’t care about the American audience.”

London argued that the 2024 adaptation was more concerned with its reception in Japan, saying: “They made it basically for Japan, and I was happy about it because I didn’t want my show to be copied. I think I did such a great job, and it won so many accolades, that I didn’t want them to copy it, which they didn’t do.

“But the new one is funny because everybody I talked to said, ‘I don’t understand it. What’s it all about?’ I watched the whole thing. It’s very difficult to stick with. It won all the awards because there were no big shows against it. There was not too much competition.”

London admitted he had hoped the new version might reinvigorate interest in his 1980 adaptation, which starred Richard Chamberlain in the role later taken by Cosmo Jarvis.

Apple TV+ logo

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days

New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled

Try for free

Apple TV+ logo

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days

New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled

Try for free

“It was disappointing,” said London. “There wasn’t too much said about mine. Also, the new one has basically just one British actor in it, and frankly, he didn’t have the charisma that Richard Chamberlain had.”

In a four-star review of the 2024 version for The Independentcritic Nick Hilton wrote that the series could be considered the “new Game of Thrones.”

He added: “This well-paced and considered saga will reward grown-up viewers and prove that there’s still room for a historical epic among the elves, dragons and zombies of big-budget telly.”



Source link

Leave a Comment